Comment on The myth of shareholder capitalism (2010)parentComments−_deliriumOP14yThe article mentions that case, saying that while it hasn't been explicitly overruled, the decision is now generally ignored by courts and not cited as precedent. (It was also only a Michigan decision, binding only on Michigan courts.)
Comments
The article mentions that case, saying that while it hasn't been explicitly overruled, the decision is now generally ignored by courts and not cited as precedent. (It was also only a Michigan decision, binding only on Michigan courts.)