Take a step back from being the author of this article, take a deep breath, and read through the whole of this comments page and try to get a feeling for the big picture.
From an non-vested point of view, I see an article presenting a point of view, 95% of comments disagreeing with the article, and the remaining 5% are you telling them they're wrong.
It feels like you've got a bit of an axe to grind. You've said your piece, now it's time to just accept that not everyone (or in fact most hacker news readers this morning) agrees with you
Comments
True, but the least important in the mix was Jobs.
Take a step back from being the author of this article, take a deep breath, and read through the whole of this comments page and try to get a feeling for the big picture.
From an non-vested point of view, I see an article presenting a point of view, 95% of comments disagreeing with the article, and the remaining 5% are you telling them they're wrong.
It feels like you've got a bit of an axe to grind. You've said your piece, now it's time to just accept that not everyone (or in fact most hacker news readers this morning) agrees with you
In YOUR opinion. I doubt those involved would agree.....if Woz was left to what he wanted to do he would have been giving away products......
All were equally important in starting the company.....
Based on what?
Building really cool technology that you decide to give a way sounds a lot like how many startups have failed.
You've attributed arbitrary value to peoples worth when you have absolutely no way to know if you are correct.