Comment on Why Founders Should Emulate Wozniak, Not JobsparentComments−trevor99OP14yFirst statement is completely up for debate. Jobs did continue without Wozniak and he failed every product in the next 18 years and spent millions of dollars. Not something founders here can emulate.−mh_14yIt's worth checking out how many of Jobs' "failures" eventually came to pass. Crazy ideas like the stability of Unix with an Apple GUI..−jonhendry14y"he failed every product in the next 18 years and spent millions of dollars."The Mac failed?NeXTSTEP failed, when it's running the millions of Mac, iPhone, iPad, iPod touch, and Apple TVs today?Pixar failed?Jobs' record has more successes than Wozniak's.
Comments
First statement is completely up for debate. Jobs did continue without Wozniak and he failed every product in the next 18 years and spent millions of dollars. Not something founders here can emulate.
It's worth checking out how many of Jobs' "failures" eventually came to pass. Crazy ideas like the stability of Unix with an Apple GUI..
"he failed every product in the next 18 years and spent millions of dollars."
The Mac failed?
NeXTSTEP failed, when it's running the millions of Mac, iPhone, iPad, iPod touch, and Apple TVs today?
Pixar failed?
Jobs' record has more successes than Wozniak's.