Skip to content

Comment on One Good Engineer Is Better Than Three Normal Ones

Comments

i could see your argument from 10 to 100, but 1 to 3 is a practical productivity multiplier. There's also risk of the 1 engineer going to another company that thinks the same way but for $650,000 and now you're left with 0 engineers and no development.

$650,000 is quite the sum, I'd like to know who is paying that :) At least if they leave, you have saved the future salary you would have paid to them, and if they were truly worth their salt, even 3 months of their work is better than 9 months of luke-warm developers (just think of all the CRUD repositories and FooBarFactories you'll have!)

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.