Comment on White House responds to Patent PetitionparentComments−anamax14y> So "new" and "non-obvious" weren't already requirements?? That explains a lot.On the off chance that you weren't being ironic, novelty and non-obviousness (to one "skilled in the art") have been requirements for decades.The author of "we've issued new guidance" is either playing you for a sap or doesn't know patent law.
Comments
> So "new" and "non-obvious" weren't already requirements?? That explains a lot.
On the off chance that you weren't being ironic, novelty and non-obviousness (to one "skilled in the art") have been requirements for decades.
The author of "we've issued new guidance" is either playing you for a sap or doesn't know patent law.