Comment on Introduction to Linux Intel Assembly LanguageparentComments−ajross14yThere sort of is. The kernel is one of the few places where gas is assumed and AT&T syntax prevails. Tutorials for "x86 assembly" in general almost always use the incompatible Intel syntax.(They both suck, by the way. Just in different ways.)−mahmud14yGAS is verbose but is "strongly typed", in a Willy-Wonka Hungarian-notation sort of a way.
Comments
There sort of is. The kernel is one of the few places where gas is assumed and AT&T syntax prevails. Tutorials for "x86 assembly" in general almost always use the incompatible Intel syntax.
(They both suck, by the way. Just in different ways.)
GAS is verbose but is "strongly typed", in a Willy-Wonka Hungarian-notation sort of a way.