Skip to content

Comment on I fixed my broken monitor with a hair dryerparent

Comments

I think it makes sense when you read it carefully. What tripped me up is that quiescent current is usually only seen as a bad thing. It not drawing enough current also seems more like a symptom than the cause.

On my first pass I was also a bit confused whether he is talking about the regulator's internal circuitry or something else: It's not obvious that LDO stands for low-dropout regulator, so at first it felt like he's misusing "quiescent current" to refer to some kind of "standby current" (comparable to an ATX power supply +5V Standby line) that the regulator has to supply to some other circuitry that then powers on the regulator to supply the rest of the device.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.