If Lucasfilm ever owned the copyright to these books, they could grant themselves the right to publish without obligations. They didn't, so they never owned the copyrights, so Disney doesn't either.
After all, a contract to let somebody publish your book in exchange for royalties is basically a license agreement, right? The copyright owners granted Lucasfilm a license to publish as long as certain obligations were met, same as when you publish code under GPL. Disney's position is analogous to saying they acquired the right to use your GPL code, but not any of the obligations the GPL imposes. That's why it's absurd.
I think this metaphor doesn't pass the smell test, because there are loads of examples of products with royalty structures where ownership is kind of well defined.
I don't believe that Harrison Ford owns just the vertical slices of star wars scenes he is present in. An editor of a book doesn't own just the changes they made.
And for things like books based off of existing material, the author of the book doesn't own Star Wars concepts right? They're using that under a specific license as well.
And yet royalty payments for movies exist. Though to your point Hollywood accounting is _the_ classic example of doing a bunch of sneaky stuff to avoid paying royalties.
Comments
If Lucasfilm ever owned the copyright to these books, they could grant themselves the right to publish without obligations. They didn't, so they never owned the copyrights, so Disney doesn't either.
After all, a contract to let somebody publish your book in exchange for royalties is basically a license agreement, right? The copyright owners granted Lucasfilm a license to publish as long as certain obligations were met, same as when you publish code under GPL. Disney's position is analogous to saying they acquired the right to use your GPL code, but not any of the obligations the GPL imposes. That's why it's absurd.
I think this metaphor doesn't pass the smell test, because there are loads of examples of products with royalty structures where ownership is kind of well defined.
I don't believe that Harrison Ford owns just the vertical slices of star wars scenes he is present in. An editor of a book doesn't own just the changes they made.
And for things like books based off of existing material, the author of the book doesn't own Star Wars concepts right? They're using that under a specific license as well.
And yet royalty payments for movies exist. Though to your point Hollywood accounting is _the_ classic example of doing a bunch of sneaky stuff to avoid paying royalties.