It sounds like they're filling the air of the court with words that sound good, individually, for their case, also signalling that they have a lot of power and authority, very good lawyering, prestigious lawyers.
It's like a collage of arguments that have stood up in court. Just like their contracts are collages.
Their contribution is the glue. Like glue code, glue sentences. Transition sentences. Stapling pages together.
So there's like a pecking order of lawyers, from my post-brain-surgery reconstruction of reality. It's like, lawyers don't really duke it out in court even metaphorically, they have a reputation with each other, emnities surprisingly, alliances unsurprisingly, they don't use all the arguments they could use.
Well it's based on fighting, I know that well, it's words-fighting. That's its origin, that's exactly what the fuck it is, you talk stupid so you hire an eloquent tongue-tier to say beautiful things for your case. Before the lawyer era--in the champion era--the client fought poorly (was weak), so he paid a strong fighter who would fight for him.
I am however qualified to say what it would be like today if we still had champions instead of attorneys. I would do the same thing if I both were a bad man and agreed to fight on behalf of others for pay. Dude pro-wrestling! Faces and heels! All the way! Then you don't get hurt, ever! All the champions pretend to fight tooth and nail but don't, you hurt him he hurts you back, so it's dance-fighting choreography shit. You keep the fight going if you're paid by the second, and mostly you don't truly want to win for the sake of person you're defending. For your fighting record yeah, not for your client. You might owe the opponent a favor, it was his turn last time. And there's a pecking order, you don't just take any fight against any fighter. There is power projection, linked to price.
Because of all the champions there can only be one champion and the all of the rest are champions who aren't the champion.
Comments
It sounds like they're filling the air of the court with words that sound good, individually, for their case, also signalling that they have a lot of power and authority, very good lawyering, prestigious lawyers.
It's like a collage of arguments that have stood up in court. Just like their contracts are collages.
Their contribution is the glue. Like glue code, glue sentences. Transition sentences. Stapling pages together.
So there's like a pecking order of lawyers, from my post-brain-surgery reconstruction of reality. It's like, lawyers don't really duke it out in court even metaphorically, they have a reputation with each other, emnities surprisingly, alliances unsurprisingly, they don't use all the arguments they could use.
Well it's based on fighting, I know that well, it's words-fighting. That's its origin, that's exactly what the fuck it is, you talk stupid so you hire an eloquent tongue-tier to say beautiful things for your case. Before the lawyer era--in the champion era--the client fought poorly (was weak), so he paid a strong fighter who would fight for him.
I am however qualified to say what it would be like today if we still had champions instead of attorneys. I would do the same thing if I both were a bad man and agreed to fight on behalf of others for pay. Dude pro-wrestling! Faces and heels! All the way! Then you don't get hurt, ever! All the champions pretend to fight tooth and nail but don't, you hurt him he hurts you back, so it's dance-fighting choreography shit. You keep the fight going if you're paid by the second, and mostly you don't truly want to win for the sake of person you're defending. For your fighting record yeah, not for your client. You might owe the opponent a favor, it was his turn last time. And there's a pecking order, you don't just take any fight against any fighter. There is power projection, linked to price.
Because of all the champions there can only be one champion and the all of the rest are champions who aren't the champion.