I think their point was that very few people want this stuff, which may or may not be true.
Based upon the comments so far, it sounds like a lot of this stuff is unwanted since it is either low quality or they get so much of it that it is redundant. It sounds like a lot of people would welcome it if it was higher quality or not redundant.
I would hardly call it an environmental crusade if it stops behaviours that are out of habit and that people do not find beneficial, unlike your examples (most of which people do because it has value in their life).
Comments
I think their point was that very few people want this stuff, which may or may not be true.
Based upon the comments so far, it sounds like a lot of this stuff is unwanted since it is either low quality or they get so much of it that it is redundant. It sounds like a lot of people would welcome it if it was higher quality or not redundant.
I would hardly call it an environmental crusade if it stops behaviours that are out of habit and that people do not find beneficial, unlike your examples (most of which people do because it has value in their life).