It could be its pre-emptive to risk. I can't but think a conversation to JP is going to descend into name-calling. All it needs is a crosslink to Rogan and it's sure to fire off.
And I say that, as somebody who is very likely to be contributing to the mess because I am unsure I can restrain myself from polemic. Dislike of these individuals shouldn't colour honest debate, but I struggle with this. I don't believe in some (false) moral euivalency here, and I know that has direct impact on the quality of discourse.
Comments
It could be its pre-emptive to risk. I can't but think a conversation to JP is going to descend into name-calling. All it needs is a crosslink to Rogan and it's sure to fire off.
And I say that, as somebody who is very likely to be contributing to the mess because I am unsure I can restrain myself from polemic. Dislike of these individuals shouldn't colour honest debate, but I struggle with this. I don't believe in some (false) moral euivalency here, and I know that has direct impact on the quality of discourse.