So, if you've done nothing wrong but you don't want your banking details to be leaked for journalists in hostile countries to comb through looking for something they can pin on you, maybe Bitcoin would be a better alternative.
But with Bitcoin all transactions are public, journalists don't need a leak.
Transactions, yes, and dates and amounts, but not names. And many "transactions" on the blockchain are within a single wallet.
It'll be interesting to see what happens when journalists start reporting on the immense data in the blockchain, but for whatever reason it hasn't happened yet. I don't think it'll happen as long as the "journalists" are the kind that think it's okay to publish an encryption key to a publicly available encrypted file of confidential data: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_diplomatic_cable...
Comments
But with Bitcoin all transactions are public, journalists don't need a leak.
Transactions, yes, and dates and amounts, but not names. And many "transactions" on the blockchain are within a single wallet.
It'll be interesting to see what happens when journalists start reporting on the immense data in the blockchain, but for whatever reason it hasn't happened yet. I don't think it'll happen as long as the "journalists" are the kind that think it's okay to publish an encryption key to a publicly available encrypted file of confidential data: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_diplomatic_cable...