Comment on C++98 Support Costs Extra (or why we should switch to C++11 now)Comments−colomon14yAnd in the (rather depressing) real world, I have gotten flack in the past year for making changes to my source code that required C++98 compatibility, which made said code no longer compile on Microsoft Visual Studio 6.0.−wazoox14yDo they still run Windows NT4 on their dev systems, too? This is quite surprising.−colomon14yNo idea, and I'm kind of scared to ask.
Comments
And in the (rather depressing) real world, I have gotten flack in the past year for making changes to my source code that required C++98 compatibility, which made said code no longer compile on Microsoft Visual Studio 6.0.
Do they still run Windows NT4 on their dev systems, too? This is quite surprising.
No idea, and I'm kind of scared to ask.