> According to statisticians, it is almost impossible to manipulate data in a way that a certain outcome is guaranteed and Benford’s Law is met at the same time. Hence, tax authorities in several countries are using Benford’s Law as a default testing device.
I'd be very interested in evidence to support this. This doesn't sound correct. "Almost impossible?"
Comments
The article says:
> According to statisticians, it is almost impossible to manipulate data in a way that a certain outcome is guaranteed and Benford’s Law is met at the same time. Hence, tax authorities in several countries are using Benford’s Law as a default testing device.
I'd be very interested in evidence to support this. This doesn't sound correct. "Almost impossible?"