Skip to content

Comment on COM+ Revisitedparent

Comments

you are the expert so please correct me if I oversimplify> to me .net assemblies and Java JAR files are just a portable DLL (because they use bytecode and support reflexion).

OSGi seem to push the concept further and try to define how plugin should integrate in a hosting application (ex: eclipse ID plugin, web browser extension ...) The way OSGi try to achieve this is by defining protocol for dependency injection (Services Registry, Modules, Life-Cycle inteface ..)

I never really understood COM, I built some OCX module for visual basic 6. I have been told OCX are ActiveX control and that ActiveX control are based on COM but this is all confusing.

It all depends on how you define a software component. I use one definition in my thesis, and I argue that .NET assemblies satisfy that definition, as do OSGi bundles (but not plain JAR files). (There have been many, many attempts at defining a software component, and they tend to be incompatible with one another.)

In the end, it doesn't much matter. I chose a topic for my thesis way back in 2005, and at that time, there was some academic interest in what was called Component-Based Software Engineering (CBSE). That interest, as far as I can tell, evaporated pretty quickly.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.