Did you read the article per chance? There are very valid criticisms in it and none of your "arguments" here seem like they pertain to the claims the article makes.
Yes I did, and no they're not. It's basically a regurgitation of the traditional arguments against crypto, with some extra words around them, akin to "less space than a nomad. lame" to describe the ipod.
You may not believe me, never mind then, but sometimes I see good criticism with interesting new ideas and little to no appeal to emotions, but this has none of that.
Comments
Did you read the article per chance? There are very valid criticisms in it and none of your "arguments" here seem like they pertain to the claims the article makes.
Yes I did, and no they're not. It's basically a regurgitation of the traditional arguments against crypto, with some extra words around them, akin to "less space than a nomad. lame" to describe the ipod.
You may not believe me, never mind then, but sometimes I see good criticism with interesting new ideas and little to no appeal to emotions, but this has none of that.