Skip to content

Comment on Security vulnerability in Rust standard libraryparent

Comments

When you work with low-level languages and refuse to read the spec carefully, you are to blame more than the language or the spec.

This is true to some extent but I think there is a reasonable argument that the language specs are generally geared towards people building compilers or similar tools, and it's not reasonable to expect everyone who works with a language to be intimately familiar with the spec at that level. In the case of C++, the language complexity seems to be at the point where even people who are highly-skilled and work on tools like Clang are still hesitant to say they fully understand the rules around undefined behaviour.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.