I like what the GPL is trying to achieve, but frankly I dislike the 'collateral damage'; blocking proprietary software from using it is fine, but it also blocks the non-copyleft licensed (MIT, BSD, Apache, etc) projects from benefiting from the code.
In the OSS/Free Software world, GPL takes and never "gives back". I'm not comfortable with that position.
Comments
I like what the GPL is trying to achieve, but frankly I dislike the 'collateral damage'; blocking proprietary software from using it is fine, but it also blocks the non-copyleft licensed (MIT, BSD, Apache, etc) projects from benefiting from the code.
In the OSS/Free Software world, GPL takes and never "gives back". I'm not comfortable with that position.