It won't make any sense if you haven't watched the film.

Basically you're looking for charismatic/deeply delusional founder, money-grubbing lawyer, smartest-person-in-the-room theoretical person, old-fashioned person who complains about the new way of doing things (but who might be right), scientist who cares only about results and who has no ethics, annoying kids.

It's more a joke that I've seen play out in real life than a truely common method for analyzing dysfunction.