That explains it. I was wondering, isn't this going to lead to a lot of courtroom time? I didn't realize California killed non-compete clauses, thanks!
Whether Intel's SoC chips will end up being good is orthogonal.
Competition is not about a party making better stuff than another, it's about been given the chance to work to make it (and not have BS inpediments, like implicit or explicit aggrements to never cross-hire between two companies).
Comments
More proof that California not allowing non-competes is a key driver of innovation.
The lead architect of every main Apple CPU from A7 to the M1Max is still going through a court case, being sued because of a non-compete for trying to do a startup https://www.theregister.com/2019/12/09/apple_nuvia_ceo_suit/
That explains it. I was wondering, isn't this going to lead to a lot of courtroom time? I didn't realize California killed non-compete clauses, thanks!
It won't be proof until Intel delivers.
Parent said competition. This is competition.
Whether Intel's SoC chips will end up being good is orthogonal.
Competition is not about a party making better stuff than another, it's about been given the chance to work to make it (and not have BS inpediments, like implicit or explicit aggrements to never cross-hire between two companies).
"Prior to working for Apple, Wilcox was at Intel where he served as a principal engineer on PC chipsets ..."