Skip to content

Comment on Ask HN: Is no-code a future of web development?parent

Comments

I get what you are saying, but specifically with Bubble[0], I've been able to walk a far longer part of the stretch from low code to full stack code than it was possible in the past. It's crazy how easy it is to hook in custom JS components, etc.. I'd recommend it to anyone who is still in the validation phase of a product.

In the end we still had to ditch them, as the low-code cowboy coding didn't mesh well with the need for multiple environments and running tests in CI and backups, etc..

[0]: https://bubble.io/

That is the last part of the whole thing. You should have the full code base of your No/Low Code product, so once you do grown out of the designed limit, you could actually dip into or hire programmers to do it. All while sending feedback to the product of what force you to get the full code base.

And I haven't see anything like that ( yet ). Because from a business perspective, you want your client to be locked into SaaS, but from a user perspective, they want to have the option to full control.

But I will take a look at bubble, seems interesting judging by the showcase.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.