Skip to content

Comment on Canada tells Boeing its bid for fighter jet contract falls shortparent

Comments

It's not quite that simple. Regarding the Gripen:

During the design process, great priority was placed on facilitating and minimizing aircraft maintenance; in addition to a maintenance-friendly layout, many subsystems and components require little or no maintenance at all. [...] According to Saab, the Gripen provides "50% lower operating costs than its best competitor".
A 2012 Jane's Aerospace and Defense Consulting study compared the operational costs of a number of modern combat aircraft, concluding that Gripen had the lowest cost per flight hour (CPFH) when fuel used, pre-flight preparation and repair, and scheduled airfield-level maintenance together with associated personnel costs were combined. The Gripen had an estimated CPFH of US$4,700 whereas the next lowest, the F-16 Block 40/50, had a 49% higher CPFH at $7,000

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_JAS_39_Gripen#Usability_a...

I'll admit I don't know all the ins and outs here, but I do know that "unit cost" is not the same as "final price tag".

the F-16 Block 40/50, had a 49% higher CPFH at $7,000

and F-35 is probably around $30k/h

It's at 33k/h right now.

So, given usually life of aircraft is around 10k hours, difference between 5k and 33k is very large: 10000*(33000-5000) = 280M

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.