So you claim to have "significant data" but the first thing you do is throw out huge swaths of it because it's not actually significant?
Also regarding graph 2's commentary, 0.51 is not "almost" double 0.34. It turns out to be only 1.5x, so calling it "almost double" is about as meaningful as calling it "almost the same".
Comments
So you claim to have "significant data" but the first thing you do is throw out huge swaths of it because it's not actually significant?
Also regarding graph 2's commentary, 0.51 is not "almost" double 0.34. It turns out to be only 1.5x, so calling it "almost double" is about as meaningful as calling it "almost the same".