Comment on Microsoft removes hot reload from open source .NET, locks it to Visual StudioComments−phendrenad24yWelcome to corporate-owned open-source. You COULD fork .NET and add hot-reload back in. But you won't. And they know it.−oaiey4yWell, try to squeeze something into Linux without Linus approval. Every project has a ultimate authority somehow.But you are completely right. Especially with the last sentence.−mycall4yI wonder how hard to diff the feature back in.−Angius4yIt's, apparently, a couple thousands lines. It could, perhaps, even be made into its own separate tool. Haven't looked at it myself, though.
Comments
Welcome to corporate-owned open-source. You COULD fork .NET and add hot-reload back in. But you won't. And they know it.
Well, try to squeeze something into Linux without Linus approval. Every project has a ultimate authority somehow.
But you are completely right. Especially with the last sentence.
I wonder how hard to diff the feature back in.
It's, apparently, a couple thousands lines. It could, perhaps, even be made into its own separate tool. Haven't looked at it myself, though.