Comment on Waterfox BrowserparentComments−duskwuff4yIts thing nowadays is being a fork of a Firefox release old enough to still support XUL. Which means it's effectively a 4+ year old version of Firefox, with no renderer isolation and no support for most web features added in the last four years.−solarkraft4yeffectively a 4+ year old version of Firefox, with no renderer isolation and no support for most web features added in the last four yearsOkay, hilarious. “Impressive that they’re keeping it up to date while maintaining XUL support”, I thought. Never mind.
Comments
Its thing nowadays is being a fork of a Firefox release old enough to still support XUL. Which means it's effectively a 4+ year old version of Firefox, with no renderer isolation and no support for most web features added in the last four years.
Okay, hilarious. “Impressive that they’re keeping it up to date while maintaining XUL support”, I thought. Never mind.