Skip to content

Comment on Ask HN: Why a 4-day workweek don't get traction or a major movement?

Comments

I think it's for a few reasons:

Stigma: Much like the phrase "remote work" had 5 years ago, there is a stigma around the 4 day work week e.g. for many, it's a synonym for "laziness"

Fear: if a company switches to a 4 day week, most believe the customer output will suffer. This has been shown not to be the case however [1, 2, 3]

Culture: Although it's improving, I believe there is still a culture of "work-hard / play hard" in many companies (especially those which are VC backed) - a 4 day work week is the antithesis of this

[1] https://www.4dayweek.com/case-studies-more/mrl-consulting

[2] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/nov/04/microsoft...

[3] https://www.theguardian.com/money/2019/feb/19/four-day-week-...

p.s. I run https://4dayweek.io - I've now sourced around 50 Tech companies which have a 4 day work week and it's increasing every week. I believe it will become major movement

for many, it's a synonym for "laziness"

which is weird because most people doing 4 days are taking a pay cut to do it - and thus, earning the exact same per hour as before!

Those who say 4 days is lazy somehow don't also say that not working weekends (without pay) is not lazy...

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.