Understood, but the owner of that Twitter account is not Starbucks' PR, correct?
Either way, I'd rather 'assume good faith' as mentioned elsewhere in this thread. Currently I'm just curious, as I've been following the card story since before it got picked up by the more mainstream media.
Comments
might be, but keep in mind that Starbucks' PR may genuinely not have been "in the loop" about this.
Understood, but the owner of that Twitter account is not Starbucks' PR, correct?
Either way, I'd rather 'assume good faith' as mentioned elsewhere in this thread. Currently I'm just curious, as I've been following the card story since before it got picked up by the more mainstream media.