Skip to content

Comment on The loss of prolific contributors in Wikipedia

Comments

As a long time, low volume contributor, I see 2 explanations for what happens:

1. There is not a lot to contribute as a lot of matters are already covered. This is not a bad thing at all.

2. Moderators do a very bad job. Last year I created an entire article about a popular vehicle, it took 6 months to be published and it was just about a page long with solid references. At one time it was rejected because it had "not enough external links", so I added half a dozen links to the dealers selling that vehicle, on top of the original manufacturer page. This discourages contributors and it is a serios problem.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.