Comment on Housing First [pdf]parentComments−actually_a_dog5yEdwards v. California? Saenz v. Roe?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwards_v._Californiahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saenz_v._Roe−wahern5yProbably https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shapiro_v._ThompsonThe ruling in the case invalidated state durational residency requirements for public assistance.−coryrc5yYes, thank you!−coryrc5yWow, surprising Saenz v Roe occurred when Shapiro v Thompson had already been decided.But, yeah, all these cases make any state with improved welfare benefits a migration target for unproductive people. Classic game theory situation.
Comments
Edwards v. California? Saenz v. Roe?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwards_v._California
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saenz_v._Roe
Probably https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shapiro_v._Thompson
Yes, thank you!
Wow, surprising Saenz v Roe occurred when Shapiro v Thompson had already been decided.
But, yeah, all these cases make any state with improved welfare benefits a migration target for unproductive people. Classic game theory situation.