In the thesis, it was not clear that the new font was easier to read than Arial.
[From a comment I made in the original submission.]
I read the tables in the thesis. There are 12 comparations between the Arial and the Dyslexie fonts, but only 2 of then have p<.1 and none of them has p<.05. So it is very difficult to know if the differences between the fonts are real or come from random noise.
Comments
In the thesis, it was not clear that the new font was easier to read than Arial.
[From a comment I made in the original submission.]
I read the tables in the thesis. There are 12 comparations between the Arial and the Dyslexie fonts, but only 2 of then have p<.1 and none of them has p<.05. So it is very difficult to know if the differences between the fonts are real or come from random noise.