But the lulz were so loud that I could not hear the core message. They were certainly not primarily activists. At best, that was a scant moral cover for what was basically mass vandalism.
On the one hand, I don't feel too bad for trolling you, since your comment basically glorifies the same activity. Lulz and all that.
On the other hand, I feel that you should understand why your comment is not smart. "X bad/useless activity is better than Y bad/useless activity, therefore X is ok" is always a stupid argument.
Comments
But the lulz were so loud that I could not hear the core message. They were certainly not primarily activists. At best, that was a scant moral cover for what was basically mass vandalism.
Why can they not be activists who seeking to increase the lulz?
Far better cause than saving whales or impeaching presidents.
No.
Care to explain? Or are you just here to troll?
I see that we are keeping this classy. Why am I not surprised?
On the one hand, I don't feel too bad for trolling you, since your comment basically glorifies the same activity. Lulz and all that.
On the other hand, I feel that you should understand why your comment is not smart. "X bad/useless activity is better than Y bad/useless activity, therefore X is ok" is always a stupid argument.