You misunderstand the purpose of the review. Per current case law if apple automatically handed the data over rather than reviewing it themselves the reading of the report would constitute an unlawful search.
A human at Apple needs to inspect it in order to quash your fourth amendment protection against a warrantless search.
Apple inspecting your images destroys your privacy, the extra step of review doesn't protect your privacy -- it's there to destroy the constitutional protection of your privacy.
Comments
You misunderstand the purpose of the review. Per current case law if apple automatically handed the data over rather than reviewing it themselves the reading of the report would constitute an unlawful search.
A human at Apple needs to inspect it in order to quash your fourth amendment protection against a warrantless search.
Apple inspecting your images destroys your privacy, the extra step of review doesn't protect your privacy -- it's there to destroy the constitutional protection of your privacy.