Comment on Contemporary COBOL: Developers' Perspectives on Defects and Defect LocationparentComments−skissane5yAt least they didn't say modern COBOL, or it will be an oxymoron.Is COBOL 2014 "modern COBOL"? https://www.iso.org/standard/51416.htmlOr what about the in-progress COBOL 202X standard? https://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink?func=ll&objId=194689...
Comments
Is COBOL 2014 "modern COBOL"? https://www.iso.org/standard/51416.html
Or what about the in-progress COBOL 202X standard? https://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink?func=ll&objId=194689...