Skip to content

Comment on SARS-CoV-2 exposure in wild white-tailed deer

Comments

I find these observations both fascinating & concerning - it represents another subtle but important dimension to consider in our ongoing efforts to mitigate the pandemic.

Although not specifically mentioned in the paper, IMO farms and home gardens are a likely place for such pathogens to be exchanged.

Highlights from the paper (which is not peer-reviewed yet):

- "We evaluated 624 pre- and post-pandemic serum samples from wild deer from four U.S. states for SARS-CoV-2 exposure."

- "Antibodies were detected in 152 samples (40%) from 2021 using a surrogate virus neutralization test."

- "Seroprevalence for individual counties was highly clustered with nearly half of the 32 counties sampled showing no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 exposure"

- "Several potential transmission routes are possible for movement of this virus into wild deer populations. [..] including captive cervid operations, field research, conservation work, wildlife tourism, wildlife rehabilitation, supplemental feeding, and hunting."

- "Wildlife contact with contaminated water sources has also been offered as a potential transmission route, although transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 from wastewater has yet to be conclusively demonstrated. Transmission from fomites or other infected animal species cannot be discounted."

- "Besides health impacts to wildlife, persistent infections in a novel host could lead to adaptation, strain evolution, and re-emergence of strains with altered transmissibility, pathogenicity, and vaccine escape."

IMO farms and home gardens are a likely place for such pathogens to be exchanged

I'm more concerned about wastewater treatment plants

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.