Skip to content

Comment on Bitcoin is Not Anonymousparent

Comments

Yes, absolutely.

We actually wrote a sentence in our paper addressing this: "While there is an under- standing amongst Bitcoin’s technical users that anonymity is not a prominent design goal of the system, we believe that this awareness is not shared throughout the community."

Also, there is a gap between 'might be possible to work from that point' and actually trying to do it; and it is this gap that a lot of Bitcoin users are counting on. The idea is out there that while it might be possible to tie things together in theory, its really not doable in practice.

The discussion mentioned on this blog, and the post its replying to, is an interesting example of the uncertainty that's out there, even among very tech savvy users: http://blogs.forbes.com/timothylee/2011/07/14/advanced-bitco...

So, we knew that Bitcoin didn't try make hard guarantees of anonymity, but we wondered how well analysis would work in practice; and it turned out to be work much better than we expected.

The problem of linking accounts, too, turned out to give us a lot more information than we think most people would have expected.

We aren't trying to claim any more than that - some people will read this and say 'huh, obvious' but we think a large number of people will also be surprised this practically worked - we were.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.