It seems to me that there may be legitimate public interest in absolute transparency whenever agencies conduct activities or investigations of a political nature.
As far as I know, to the degree it doesn't compromise the investigation (e.g. reporting that person X turned on his co-conspirators before they can be arrested), there is transparency in this case. Is there something you are worried is insufficiently covered.
Oh I’m not talking about this particular incident. {{current_administration}} is obviously right, and I don’t need to know anything else. I’m talking about all the things that {{rival_party}} did. They’re terrible.
You truly are enlightened and above the political fray. I am so happy you pointed out how smart you are. Truly, you added something to the conversation.
Comments
It seems to me that there may be legitimate public interest in absolute transparency whenever agencies conduct activities or investigations of a political nature.
As far as I know, to the degree it doesn't compromise the investigation (e.g. reporting that person X turned on his co-conspirators before they can be arrested), there is transparency in this case. Is there something you are worried is insufficiently covered.
Oh I’m not talking about this particular incident. {{current_administration}} is obviously right, and I don’t need to know anything else. I’m talking about all the things that {{rival_party}} did. They’re terrible.
You truly are enlightened and above the political fray. I am so happy you pointed out how smart you are. Truly, you added something to the conversation.