A few examples of the singular "they", courtesy of Wikipedia:
Eche of theym sholde ... make theymselfe redy. — Caxton, Sonnes of Aymon (c. 1489)
Arise; one knocks. / ... / Hark, how they knock! — Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet (c. 1595)
'Tis meet that some more audience than a mother, since nature makes them partial, should o'erhear the speech. — Shakespeare, Hamlet
I would have everybody marry if they can do it properly. — Austen, Mansfield Park (1814)
That's always your way, Maim—always sailing in to help somebody before they're hurt. — Mark Twain, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884)
Caesar: "No, Cleopatra. No man goes to battle to be killed." / Cleopatra: "But they do get killed". — Shaw, Caesar and Cleopatra (1901)
The singular "they" has extensive precedent. Some proscriptive grammarians feel that it should be disallowed, but given the usefulness of a neutral pronoun and the venerable history of the usage, I think they may be safely ignored.
I think that is a little bit misleading; I am fairly certain that there are plenty of examples of nonstandard usage in works by any of those authors that you would absolutely not accept as correct. Particularly Shakespeare, who is well known for using common parlance in his works rather than proper English.
Comments
A few examples of the singular "they", courtesy of Wikipedia:
Eche of theym sholde ... make theymselfe redy. — Caxton, Sonnes of Aymon (c. 1489)
Arise; one knocks. / ... / Hark, how they knock! — Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet (c. 1595)
'Tis meet that some more audience than a mother, since nature makes them partial, should o'erhear the speech. — Shakespeare, Hamlet
I would have everybody marry if they can do it properly. — Austen, Mansfield Park (1814)
That's always your way, Maim—always sailing in to help somebody before they're hurt. — Mark Twain, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884)
Caesar: "No, Cleopatra. No man goes to battle to be killed." / Cleopatra: "But they do get killed". — Shaw, Caesar and Cleopatra (1901)
The singular "they" has extensive precedent. Some proscriptive grammarians feel that it should be disallowed, but given the usefulness of a neutral pronoun and the venerable history of the usage, I think they may be safely ignored.
I think that is a little bit misleading; I am fairly certain that there are plenty of examples of nonstandard usage in works by any of those authors that you would absolutely not accept as correct. Particularly Shakespeare, who is well known for using common parlance in his works rather than proper English.