Skip to content

Comment on Testing Benford's Lawparent

Comments

Exactly. I immediately thought it's an artifact of our base-10 system.

except that it applies to any base-n system. It's an artifact of the underlying system, not the base value.

What about base-e?

That's just silly. On the other hand, base 2i would be very efficient: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quater-imaginary_base

Really, why don't we have a transcendental numbering system? Also, I can't imagine it could make our financial markets any more irrational.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.