Benford's Law predicts the first digit will be 1 about 30% of the time, not 50% of the time.
Your method also seems to depend heavily on the choice of starting and ending points. If I chose 1-99, then only 1/10th of the numbers in the interval will start with 1. So why choose 199 and not 99?
It is not "my method". Just an explanation of why the law seems intuitive to me. I expected everyone to extrapolate out from my examples for other ending points, and which point, yes, the % for the digit of "1" would drop, and approach that 30% rate.
I just selected end points to illustrate the concept. I think this place is getting a little too literal. :)
Comments
Benford's Law predicts the first digit will be 1 about 30% of the time, not 50% of the time.
Your method also seems to depend heavily on the choice of starting and ending points. If I chose 1-99, then only 1/10th of the numbers in the interval will start with 1. So why choose 199 and not 99?
It is not "my method". Just an explanation of why the law seems intuitive to me. I expected everyone to extrapolate out from my examples for other ending points, and which point, yes, the % for the digit of "1" would drop, and approach that 30% rate.
I just selected end points to illustrate the concept. I think this place is getting a little too literal. :)