I can understand people decrying results of .05 seconds apart or so, but 3 second start ups? That would be infuriating. That kind of UX would take me back quite a few decades...
Garwk. I've helped write whole operating systems that boot in less time. [Atari ST. Check. Newton OS. Check. Other stuff I can't talk about: tens of milliseconds, mostly waiting for external crap like USB to initialize and settle down.]
Comments
I can understand people decrying results of .05 seconds apart or so, but 3 second start ups? That would be infuriating. That kind of UX would take me back quite a few decades...
Garwk. I've helped write whole operating systems that boot in less time. [Atari ST. Check. Newton OS. Check. Other stuff I can't talk about: tens of milliseconds, mostly waiting for external crap like USB to initialize and settle down.]
What przemelek actually suggested is that you won't notice the difference between a 63.1 second run time and a 60.05 second run time.