Apparently you didn't bother to fully read their comment, or even look at the page.
Was there a need for this attitude (which, by the way, violates HN guidelines)?
I was looking, not unreasonably, at the linked page. I see that indeed the first example on the "Examples" page exhibits this wobble - thanks to user jmiskovic who was actually helpful.
I'll direct you to my second response to you, where I point out why it appeared from what you wrote that you either hadn't read the original comment fully, or had not examined the subject of that comment. I believe pointing this out was not a violation of HN guidelines, while your negative attitude in multiple comments since then is most definitely in violation.
As far as being helpful, I don't think your first comment falls into that category either.
Comments
Was there a need for this attitude (which, by the way, violates HN guidelines)?
I was looking, not unreasonably, at the linked page. I see that indeed the first example on the "Examples" page exhibits this wobble - thanks to user jmiskovic who was actually helpful.
I'll direct you to my second response to you, where I point out why it appeared from what you wrote that you either hadn't read the original comment fully, or had not examined the subject of that comment. I believe pointing this out was not a violation of HN guidelines, while your negative attitude in multiple comments since then is most definitely in violation.
As far as being helpful, I don't think your first comment falls into that category either.
write a song about it