Skip to content

Comment on Robots.txt for the NYT has a specific exclusion for an 1996 news articleparent

Comments

I thought the "right to be forgotten" is simply meant to prevent certain websites from appearing in search engine results. Isn't that precisely what robots.txt accomplishes? Does the right to be forgotten also compel website owners to censor their own content?

Accomplishes the same, but it's a different mechanism.

RTBF does not use robots.txt (and then require that it be respected) on the site hosting the thing to be forgotten, it's an exclusion on the search engine side.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.