Does anyone know the history behind why there’s two ways to “encode” things like that? What’s the rationale for having both combining and precombined codepoints?
I believe a lot of the "combined" characters are (basically) from importing old codepages directly into Unicode, and they did that so it would be a simple formula to convert from the various codepages in use.
Comments
An excellent article, although:
would be a great opportunity to talk about normal form, because there’s also a single code point version: “latin capital letter u with diaeresis”.
Does anyone know the history behind why there’s two ways to “encode” things like that? What’s the rationale for having both combining and precombined codepoints?
I believe a lot of the "combined" characters are (basically) from importing old codepages directly into Unicode, and they did that so it would be a simple formula to convert from the various codepages in use.
I may be wrong however.