The community would fork the blockchain at some agree-upon moment, add a new encryption scheme, and carry on.
There would probably be some competing chains as different communities tried to be "the one". Things might settle down at some point as it's really a "winner takes all" market.
Comments
The community would fork the blockchain at some agree-upon moment, add a new encryption scheme, and carry on.
There would probably be some competing chains as different communities tried to be "the one". Things might settle down at some point as it's really a "winner takes all" market.
Signing (or hashing), not encryption. Bitcoin doesn't use any encryption, only hashing and digital signatures.
How bout the mess of coins being moved by anyone with access to machines able to break the encryption?