Skip to content

Comment on Coq 8.13parent

Comments

Why is that? And what alternative do you prefer? I do not mind it for what it is meant for. I rather would have it more practical (instead of having to write software twice: once to prove it and once to execute it), but that is also very new and experimental, like F* or Idris.

As I said before, it was mostly because it used to crash a lot for weird reasons (I think it didn't really like something in my laptop's memory) and the only explanations I ever got were in French.

If they finally finished translating the documentation and the errors (or fixed whatever memory weirdness was affecting my version) it wouldn't be so bad. I'd still hate it from the countless sleepless night trying to get it start again before the weekly assignment's deadline, though.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.