Can anyone explain to me how the article or even title of the article would make someone think the FTC was doing something and then require such a statement from pg?
It is referenced in both as a complaint and is news for wired readers, not necessarily here (though the FTC complaint being filed here is new).
That was my fault. I originally wrote the hed as "FTC Complaint: Dropbox Lied to Users about Data Security", which I thought would get around people reading just the "Dropbox Lied To Users" part. PG changed it to the hed from the article, I suppose to make sure nobody thought the complaint originated from the FTC.
Comments
Can anyone explain to me how the article or even title of the article would make someone think the FTC was doing something and then require such a statement from pg?
It is referenced in both as a complaint and is news for wired readers, not necessarily here (though the FTC complaint being filed here is new).
That was my fault. I originally wrote the hed as "FTC Complaint: Dropbox Lied to Users about Data Security", which I thought would get around people reading just the "Dropbox Lied To Users" part. PG changed it to the hed from the article, I suppose to make sure nobody thought the complaint originated from the FTC.