... related to her wrongful termination complaint, arguing that she shouldn't have been fired for leaking information in 2013. So either those documents are irrelevant except to show why she is a former UN human rights lawyer (evidently her complaint was unsuccessful) or revealing the attendees of events in advance is exactly what she leaked back then, in which case it's a bit suspicious that she suddenly got multiple outlets to report on it only 7 years after the fact.
I will humor you, and add yet more sources (though I am sure you will be able to find something objectionable about each)
The problem common to all of them is that they're not independent sources, but just different write-ups of the same person's statements, namely that former UN employee. Adding more links isn't the same as adding more information.
not independent sources, but just different write-ups of the same person's statements
As I explicitly noted. I added them because sudosysgen was complaining about i24news/Fox/Express not being good enough, and not the whistleblower herself.
Comments
... related to her wrongful termination complaint, arguing that she shouldn't have been fired for leaking information in 2013. So either those documents are irrelevant except to show why she is a former UN human rights lawyer (evidently her complaint was unsuccessful) or revealing the attendees of events in advance is exactly what she leaked back then, in which case it's a bit suspicious that she suddenly got multiple outlets to report on it only 7 years after the fact.
The problem common to all of them is that they're not independent sources, but just different write-ups of the same person's statements, namely that former UN employee. Adding more links isn't the same as adding more information.
As I explicitly noted. I added them because sudosysgen was complaining about i24news/Fox/Express not being good enough, and not the whistleblower herself.
I was implying that large, reputable outlets did not pick up because they could not corroborate.