Hmm, that might be true. I don't like the java interop much, as it confines me to the JVM infrastructure that I really dislike.
Yeah, it might be mostly the functional bias. I was just reimplemting persistent immutable hast tables when I said, well dammit, why not try Clojure. And well, despite that I don't particularly like many things like lacking TCO, no continuations, and mostly probably the Scheme macro system, there is a lot of things that they did better.
I really like the data-structure access syntax (no more list-ref), I like that I have generic operations that work on any datastructure supporting the seq abstraction, I can see the point of reducing the number of parents in forms, I truly love that partial/curry is really part of the language, not in some implementation specific extension, I just love the -> 'operator'. Clojure is for me like Python, with much the functional programming support that Python did only get recently, with a community focus on this paradigm. Oh and with a great active helpful community in #clojure unlike the divided community of #scheme.
Before someone wonders: yeah, most can be implemented on top of Scheme, the point is that Clojure did it, and they are popular. Give me a Scheme with all the great things from Clojure and I'll never look back.
Comments
Heavy functional bias. STM.
Although, I don't know that those things make it more practical than Scheme. Just more desirable to a subset of people who like that sort of thing.
Hmm, that might be true. I don't like the java interop much, as it confines me to the JVM infrastructure that I really dislike.
Yeah, it might be mostly the functional bias. I was just reimplemting persistent immutable hast tables when I said, well dammit, why not try Clojure. And well, despite that I don't particularly like many things like lacking TCO, no continuations, and mostly probably the Scheme macro system, there is a lot of things that they did better.
I really like the data-structure access syntax (no more list-ref), I like that I have generic operations that work on any datastructure supporting the seq abstraction, I can see the point of reducing the number of parents in forms, I truly love that partial/curry is really part of the language, not in some implementation specific extension, I just love the -> 'operator'. Clojure is for me like Python, with much the functional programming support that Python did only get recently, with a community focus on this paradigm. Oh and with a great active helpful community in #clojure unlike the divided community of #scheme.
Before someone wonders: yeah, most can be implemented on top of Scheme, the point is that Clojure did it, and they are popular. Give me a Scheme with all the great things from Clojure and I'll never look back.