Skip to content

Comment on Bytecode Alliance: One year update

Comments

The nanoprocess concept seems like a big deal.

I remember reading about a vulnerability in the unix utility "strings". The code is incredibly simple at first glance, but it had a dependency to detect the filetype, and that dependency was not safe on untrusted input.

At that moment I realized that unix security was fundamentally flawed. A utility that does nothing but read its input and write the output shouldn't have permission to do anything else.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.