Comment on Show HN: CacheFSComments−sciurus15yNeat project! However, I would consider changing the name.There's already a CacheFS in Solaris. http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4727-Less-known-Solaris-Fea...Linux has a similar feature named FS-Cache, and one of its storage backends is named CacheFS. http://people.redhat.com/~dhowells/fscache/FS-Cache.pdfDo you really want to make this situation even more confusing?−cconstantineOP15yWow, somehow I completely missed that another CacheFS exists. I will definitely be looking for a new name.
Comments
Neat project! However, I would consider changing the name.
There's already a CacheFS in Solaris. http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4727-Less-known-Solaris-Fea...
Linux has a similar feature named FS-Cache, and one of its storage backends is named CacheFS. http://people.redhat.com/~dhowells/fscache/FS-Cache.pdf
Do you really want to make this situation even more confusing?
Wow, somehow I completely missed that another CacheFS exists. I will definitely be looking for a new name.